Special Subject Group on
Policy Framework for Private Investment in
Education, Health and Rural Development
Report on
A Policy Framework for Reforms in Education
1.
EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT
1.1 Social Development
Education imparts
knowledge and skills and shapes values and
attitudes. It is vital for population control,
poverty reduction, economic growth, civic order,
culture and citizenship. Education helps reduce
poverty by increasing the productivity of the
poor, reducing fertility rates, improving health
and equipping people with the skills they need to
participate fully in the economy and in society.
More generally, education helps strengthen civil
institutions, build national capacity and good
governance. These are critical elements for
progress of a civil society.
1.2 Economic Growth
Education
contributes to economic growth, but by itself
does not generate growth. Various empirical
analyses estimate that education explains about
twenty per cent of growth in a country. The
single largest contributor to this growth is
primary education.
Historically,
investment in education was considered more of a
social obligation rather than one that would give
significant returns. However, more recently,
evidence has been accumulating to demonstrate
that countries with high levels of basic
education, whether developed or developing, show
better economic performance.
An analysis of 60
countries (basic data in Table 1.1) shows
that there is a good correlation between the real
per capita GDP of a country and its adult
literacy rate. Also, that there is a better
correlation between the real per capita GDP of a
country and its first, second and third level
gross enrolment ratio. (Table 1.2)
1.3 South East Asian
Experience
South East Asian
countries are not rich in natural resources. Fast
developers in this region have invested heavily
in education. Countries that achieved universal
basic education first (Korea being a prime
example) were also the first ones to experience
substantial economic growth.
A World Bank study
in 1993 studied eight South East Asian economies
Hong Kong, Indonesia, Japan, Korea,
Malaysia, Taiwan, Singapore and Thailand
and found that the single largest contributor to
economic growth was primary education. Primary
school enrolment explained between 58 percent
(Japan) and 87 percent (Thailand) of predicted
growth. The analysis concludes that there is a
strong correlation between high levels of
education and economic growth.
Interestingly, in
the wake of the financial crisis, South East
Asian countries are shoring up their educational
systems to make them even stronger. In Thailand,
a constitutional overhaul is laying the
foundation for a radical shake up. Indonesia has
introduced an emergency scholarship system.
Singapore has begun a campaign to teach
innovative thinking. Malaysia is launching
computerised smart schools. The accent of these
countries is on a quantum leap on basic education
and skill standards to regain labour force
competitiveness, shift from rote learning to
creative thinking, less state dominance of
education and making education more responsive to
local needs.
1.4 Rates of Return
Education is an
excellent investment for society. In general, the
social rates of return to investment in all
levels of education exceed the long-term
opportunity cost of capital. Rates of return to
education are very high in low and middle-income
countries. (Table 1.3). Rates of
return in education are also better than rates of
return in other sectors such as agriculture,
industry and infrastructure. (Table 1.4).
Since education is subsidised almost everywhere
in the world, private returns to investment in
education invariably exceed social rates of
return.
1.5 Human Capital
Education is
universally recognised as an important investment
in building human capital. Human capital affects
growth in two ways. First, human capital levels
act as a driver of technological innovation.
Second, human capital stocks determine the speed
of absorption of technology. It is now widely
accepted that human capital, and not physical
capital, holds the key to persistent high growth
in per capita income. This is because people,
unlike machines, can learn. Investments that
increase people skills and productivity, yield
not diminishing returns, but constant or
increasing returns.
1.6 Market Economy
Market economies
now prevail in countries accounting for over 80 %
of the worlds population. This is a huge
increase from the 30% figure that prevailed a
decade ago. (Table 1.5) Market
based systems reward enterprise, risk taking,
skill and agility, but offer less security and a
constantly changing environment. In such a
context, education is vital since those who
compete best have an enormous advantage in the
fast paced world economy.
Globalisation of
markets and the factors that drive them -
especially knowledge is reinforcing these
impacts. Global capital constantly seeks and
flows to more favourable opportunities, including
well trained, productive and attractively priced
labour forces in a market friendly and
politically stable business environment.
Education will be at the centre stage in creating
such an environment.
1.7 Knowledge Economy
Education is
becoming even more vital in the new world of
information. Knowledge is rapidly replacing raw
materials and labour as the most critical input
for survival and success.
Knowledge has
become the new asset. More than half of the GDP
in the major OECD countries is now knowledge
based. About two thirds of the growth of world
GDP is expected to come from technology-led
businesses. (Table 1.6). This necessitates
that education and knowledge are at the centre
stage of any development process.
The global labour
market is increasingly integrated for the highly
knowledgeable and skilled corporate
executives, scientists and technologists
offering high mobility and wages. However, the
market for unskilled labour is highly restricted
by national and state barriers.
Weightless goods
with high knowledge content rather than
material content now accounts for some of
the most dynamic sectors in several economies.
The single largest export industry for the United
States is neither aircraft nor automobiles, but
entertainment. Education offers a fast track to
knowledge based growth.
A knowledge-based
economy is not restricted to mean computers and
information technology. It is a society where
knowledge transcends all economic and social
activities.
The agriculture
sector is in a particularly vulnerable situation
in the post-quantitative rate regime that will be
upon the country very shortly. India is far
behind in yield and productivity of principal
crops. Valid fears arise over the country's food
security. The industrial sector too has not seen
much improvement in technology, or productivity.
It has been harshly exposed to global competition
over the last eight years. The services sector
has advanced only in parts, and much needs to be
done in the banking and insurance sectors.
Moving towards a
knowledge-based economy should necessarily have
the objective of causing a fundamental upward
shift in the competitiveness of these sectors.
Greater reforms coupled with targeted investments
in education will make a substantial contribution
in achieving this objective.
1.8 Technology
Technology has a
pivotal role to play in the future of education.
At one level it is
through better use of existing communication
technologies. Television and radio broadcasts
offer important advantages to institutions
involved in distance education. Broadcasting
raises public awareness of the distance education
institution, its programmes and in securing
acceptance by the community at large of this
alternative means of providing access to higher
education. The programmes are also important in
providing distance education institutions with
the opportunity to demonstrate excellence in
academic content and teaching quality. This helps
secure acceptance by the academic community for
this innovative approach to learning. An
appraisal of communications-based teaching which
does not take these and related advantages into
account is likely to underestimate the role of
broadcasting in distance education.
At another level
is the spread of information technology for
revolutionising content and delivery of
education. The Internet is capturing people who
have never been touched by education. It is
expected to become the school and the university
for the dot com generations. In the United
Kingdom, British Telecom is designing the
"classroom of the future". A range of
"virtual universities" is putting the
latest technology to innovative use.
Internet offers
policy-makers additional alternatives for
delivering education and training to learners of
all ages. This technology can reduce costs,
increase access and expand the range and quality
of education and training options. It offers
poorer nations the chance to catch up. In Egypt,
a government-backed project is developing a
"utopian school", where pupils take
"the best courses from the best teachers
from around the world".
An increasing
number of countries are experimenting with
various forms of new technologies to expand
education and training options. This is because
they are able to develop multimedia materials
that reflect local values and culture, provide
visual images of desired behaviours, collaborate
across borders, and access information not
previously available.
The world of the
future will have much more education occurring
outside of schools. It will draw on vastly more
powerful technologies, like the two-way
voice-activated, computer-assisted and self-paced
learning. Such technologies will harness a much
better understanding of how people learn and what
they need to learn. Learners will be able to go
beyond the classroom and obtain information in a
variety of forms - text, data, sound, video -
from all over the world, at any time of the day
or night and at rapidly diminishing costs.
1.9 Cyber-age Education
Half of all
spheres of human activity in the world have got
wired into a connectivity that has transcended
national frontiers, geographical boundaries and
even cosmic contours. It is an age that has
brought to ones doorstep promises and
prospects for unimaginable change and progress.
Significant implications of the cyber age in the
context of the potential role of education would
be the following:
Knowledge
will no longer be a static, finite mass
bound by space and time. It will be
perpetually self-multiplying and
self-renewing in proportion to R & D
investments.
The
velocity of knowledge transmission will
be incredibly fast.
Geographical
barriers to access to knowledge will no
longer be operative. Access, of course,
will be influenced and determined by
socio-cultural, politico-economic, and
personal factors.
Generation,
transmission, storage, retrieval, renewal
and application of knowledge will not
only be very largely helped and driven by
technology, but will also be enhanced by
it, in particular by technologies of
information, communication and education.
The world,
having now increasingly adopted a market
driven economy, information will tend to
be commodified, will command an economic
value, and therefore, will tend to create
social classes of "haves" and
"have-nots".
Formal
education will tend to be more a life
long continuum, and dispersed rather than
a one-shot limited period-centralised
activity in respect of contents,
instruction, materials, human resource,
evaluation, accreditation, certification,
and management.
A rush to blend
cyber-age education into the traditional
education process must not be at the cost of
elementary education, cognitive learning,
physical activity and overall development. It
must be realised that cyber-age education
presents an option that is layered on top of a
traditional system with its benefits of
co-operative learning.
1.10 Funding
Government
spending on education is often inefficient and
inequitable. It is inefficient when it is
misallocated among uses; it is inequitable when
qualified potential students are unable to enrol
in institutions because educational opportunities
are lacking or because of their inability to pay.
A study of some
developing countries in Africa and Middle East
show that the Governments reallocate public
spending to education from other publicly funded
activities, such as defence and divestment of
public enterprises. Other countries have, within
their macroeconomic policies, increased the
revenues of government and thereby increased the
spend on education. Yet others have sought to
supplement government funds for education with
private funds.
Private financing
can be encouraged either to fund private
institutions or to supplement the income of
publicly funded institutions. Private schools are
usually financed through fees. In countries,
which excessively regulate private schools, it is
found that such restrictions discourage private
spending on education that would otherwise have
occurred and so increase the pressure on
government funded schools. Another argument in
favour of private schools and universities is
that, even though they tend to draw their
students from more advantaged socio-economic
backgrounds, they promote diversity and provide
useful competition for public institutions,
especially at higher levels of education.
1.11 Government Role
There is a need to
follow a mix of both public and private presence
in the education sector. Public intervention in
education has several advantages. It can reduce
inequality, improve accessibility, compensate for
market failures in lending for education and
disseminate information about the benefits and
availability of education.
Governments can
help improve the quality of education by
establishing standards, supporting inputs,
adopting flexible strategies for the acquisition
and use of inputs, and monitoring performance.
1.12 Equity
Achieving equity
in education means that every citizen has the
right to basic education that enables acquisition
of basic knowledge and skills to function
effectively in society. It also means that no
qualified student is denied access to education
because of an inability to pay. Ensuring equity
in education requires both financial and
administrative measures.
Financial
measures, such as scholarships, are important at
all levels to enable the poor to gain from
education. Scholarships can cover fees and other
direct costs, such as transport and uniforms and,
when appropriate, can compensate families for the
indirect costs of sending children to school -
for example, loss of labour services for the
household.
Administrative
measures can increase enrolments of the poor,
females and other deprived classes of society.
Programs designed to demonstrate the importance
of educating children can increase the demand for
schooling among the poor.
1.13 Competition
There is evidence
that competition among schools improves their
performance. For choice to be effective, the
student must have more than one possible school.
The institutions should have some distinguishing
characteristics. For example, what aspects of the
curriculum are emphasised, in teaching styles,
and, at higher levels, in course offerings.
Finally, institutions need to enjoy considerable
autonomy in how they teach. The availability of a
variety of institutions enables parents and
students to exercise choice and thus gives
institutions an incentive to adapt to demand.
1.14 Autonomy
Quality of
education can benefit when schools have the
autonomy to use instructional inputs according to
local school and community conditions and are
accountable to parents and communities. Fully
autonomous institutions have authority to
allocate their resources and they are able to
create an educational environment adapted to
local conditions inside and outside the school.
Accountable
autonomous institutions can be encouraged by both
administrative and financial means.
Administrative measures include giving school
management the authority to allocate resources -
for example, the authority to deploy personnel
and to alter such things as the timing of the
school day and year and the language of
instruction to fit local conditions. Most
critically, teachers need to have the authority
to determine classroom practices, within limits
set by a broad national curriculum.
1.15 Politics
Education is
intensely political: it affects the majority of
citizens, involves all levels of government, and
makes up a significant component of government
spending. There are also public subsidies that
are biased in favour of the elite. Prevailing
systems of education spending and management
often protect the interests of teachers and the
government rather than those of parents,
students, communities and the poor. Teachers,
administrators, textbook publishers all
have reasons to prefer things to remain as they
are, or to change only gradually.
1.16 Democracy
The concept of
democracy has spread rapidly in the last decade.
Local governments are becoming more important.
Citizens are gaining an increasing voice through
civil society organisations, community groups,
religious organisations and chambers of commerce.
If democracy is to survive, citizens must develop
capabilities that require them to be well
informed, understand the impact of issues, make
wise choices and hold elected officials
accountable for the responsibility thrust on
them. Education is the process of enlarging
peoples choices. Choices that are created
by expanding human capabilities what people
do and can do in their lives.
1.17 Directions for
India
Implicit in the
above discussion, the following are the broad
directions for India.
Globalisation
and a shift to a market-led,
knowledge-based economy demands that
education must become the cornerstone of
development if India has to find a place
at the top of the league of nations.
Building
knowledge for a competitive,
information-based society must be the
core theme of reforms in education.
Education,
for girls as well as for boys, therefore
deserves the highest priority on the
government agenda - not just those of the
Ministry of Human Resources Development.
Education
must shape adaptable, competitive workers
who can readily acquire new skills and
innovate. Education must also support the
continued expansion of knowledge.
It is
important that skills, as a result of
education, have economic value beyond
their intrinsic merit. Equally, it is
important that there is diversity in
order to avoid an abundance in any one
skill and consequent poor rewards. To
illustrate, although computer skills are
valuable, if too many computer
specialists are produced, rewards for
them will be weak.
An
increase in aggregate spending on
education is intuitively appealing, but
should be treated cautiously as
appreciable changes in education outcomes
result only with relatively large shifts
in spending. The accent must be on
promoting efficient use of resources as
much as on expanding the overall resource
envelope.
Efficiency
is achieved by making public investments
where they will yield the highest
returns. This is in the area of primary
education. Consequently, government
investments to improve enrolments and
retention in primary education must have
the highest priority in intersectional
allocation of educational resources.
Decisions
about public education priorities beyond
basic education must be taken within a
broad sectoral approach. Once we have
largely achieved universal primary and
secondary education, then we can consider
higher education as a priority.
There must
be a concerted effort to free up
resources for primary education through
concomitant changes in other sectors and
subsectors. This will mean reallocation
of public spending to education from
other sectors such as defence and
inefficient public sector enterprises. It
will also imply a gradual move to full
cost recovery in higher education and
encouraging the emergence of a largely
self-financing private sector.
To achieve
equity, the government must ensure that
no qualified student is denied access to
education because of an inability to pay.
Because
the gap between private and social
returns is larger for higher education
than for basic education, students and
parents must bear part of the costs of
higher education.
Governments
must encourage private financing by
taking on some of the risks that makes
financial institutions reluctant to lend
for higher education.
A credit
market for education, together with
selective scholarships, especially in
higher education, must be nurtured.
Concerted
steps must be taken to harness new
technology opportunities in content and
delivery of education. Prudent steps must
be taken to use already existing
technology options, such as in
communications, more effectively.
Education systems must also gear for an
era of cyber-age education without
sacrificing the basic principles of
elementary education and cognitive
learning.
A climate
of competition among educational
institutions must be fostered.
Decentralising
the management of public education and
encouraging the expansion of private and
community educational institutions must
be given thrust.
Table
1.1
BASIC
DATA RELATING TO EDUCATION PERTAINING TO 60 COUNTRIES
Country
|
Real per capita GDP
|
Adult literacy rate
|
Combined first-, second-
and third-level gross enrolment ratio
|
Public education
expenditure
|
| |
PPP$
|
%
|
%
|
% of GDP
|
| Algeria |
4,460
|
60.3
|
68.0
|
5.2
|
| Angola |
1,430
|
45.0
|
27.0
|
1.0
|
| Argentina |
10,300
|
96.5
|
79.0
|
3.5
|
| Australia |
20,210
|
99.0
|
100.0
|
5.6
|
| Bangladesh |
1,050
|
38.9
|
35.0
|
2.9
|
| Belgium |
22,750
|
99.0
|
100.0
|
3.2
|
| Bhutan |
1,467
|
44.2
|
12.0
|
1.0
|
| Brazil |
6,480
|
84.0
|
80.0
|
5.2
|
| Burkina Faso |
1,010
|
20.7
|
20.0
|
3.6
|
| Burundi |
630
|
44.6
|
23.0
|
3.2
|
| Canada |
22,480
|
99.0
|
99.0
|
7.0
|
| Central African Republic |
1,330
|
42.4
|
26.0
|
1.0
|
| Chad |
970
|
50.3
|
29.0
|
1.0
|
| China |
3,130
|
82.9
|
69.0
|
2.3
|
| Denmark |
23,690
|
99.0
|
89.0
|
8.2
|
| Egypt |
3,050
|
52.7
|
72.0
|
1.0
|
| Ethiopia |
510
|
35.4
|
24.0
|
4.0
|
| France |
22,030
|
99.0
|
92.0
|
6.1
|
| Germany |
21,260
|
99.0
|
88.0
|
4.8
|
| Greece |
12,769
|
96.6
|
79.0
|
3.0
|
| Hong Kong |
24,350
|
92.4
|
65.0
|
2.9
|
| Hungary |
7,200
|
99.0
|
74.0
|
4.7
|
| India |
1,670
|
53.5
|
55.0
|
3.4
|
| Indonesia |
3,490
|
85.0
|
64.0
|
1.4
|
| Iran |
5,817
|
73.3
|
72.0
|
1.0
|
| Iraq |
3,197
|
58.0
|
51.0
|
1.0
|
| Italy |
20,290
|
98.3
|
82.0
|
4.7
|
| Japan |
24,070
|
99.0
|
85.0
|
3.6
|
| Korea |
13,590
|
97.2
|
90.0
|
3.7
|
| Malaysia |
8,140
|
85.7
|
65.0
|
5.2
|
| Mali |
740
|
35.5
|
25.0
|
2.2
|
| Mexico |
8,370
|
90.0
|
70.0
|
4.9
|
| Mozambique |
740
|
40.5
|
25.0
|
1.0
|
| Myanmar |
1,199
|
83.6
|
55.0
|
1.2
|
| Nepal |
1,090
|
38.1
|
59.0
|
3.1
|
| Nigeria |
920
|
59.5
|
54.0
|
0.9
|
| Norway |
24,450
|
99.0
|
95.0
|
7.5
|
| Pakistan |
1,560
|
40.9
|
43.0
|
3.0
|
| Philippines |
3,520
|
94.6
|
82.0
|
2.2
|
| Portugal |
14,270
|
90.8
|
91.0
|
5.5
|
| Russian Federation |
4,370
|
99.0
|
77.0
|
4.1
|
| Rwanda |
660
|
63.0
|
43.0
|
1.8
|
| Senegal |
1,730
|
34.6
|
35.0
|
3.5
|
| Sierra Leone |
410
|
33.3
|
30.0
|
1.0
|
| Singapore |
28,460
|
91.4
|
73.0
|
3.0
|
| South Africa |
7,380
|
84.0
|
93.0
|
7.9
|
| Spain |
15,930
|
97.2
|
92.0
|
4.9
|
| Sri Lanka |
2,490
|
90.7
|
66.0
|
3.4
|
| Sudan |
1,560
|
53.3
|
34.0
|
1.0
|
| Sweden |
19,790
|
99.0
|
100.0
|
8.3
|
| Tanzania |
580
|
71.6
|
33.0
|
1.0
|
| Thailand |
6,690
|
94.7
|
59.0
|
4.1
|
| Uganda |
1,160
|
64.0
|
40.0
|
2.6
|
| United Kingdom |
20,730
|
99.0
|
100.0
|
5.4
|
| United States |
29,010
|
99.0
|
94.0
|
5.4
|
| Uruguay |
9,200
|
97.5
|
77.0
|
3.3
|
| Venezuela |
8,860
|
92.0
|
67.0
|
1.0
|
| Vietnam |
1,630
|
91.9
|
62.0
|
2.7
|
| Yemen |
810
|
42.5
|
49.0
|
6.1
|
| Zambia |
960
|
75.1
|
49.0
|
2.2
|
Source:
World Development Indicators 1999,
The World Bank
Table
1.2
CORRELATION
COEFFICIENTS ON EDUCATION DATA
PERTAINING
TO 60 COUNTRIES
(inpercentage)
Particulars
|
Real per capita GDP
|
Adult literacy rate
|
Combined first-, second-
and third-level gross enrolment ratio
|
Public education
expenditure as % of GNP
|
| Real per capita GDP |
100.00
|
|
|
|
| Adult literacy rate |
71.78
|
100.00
|
|
|
| Combined first-, second- and
third-level gross enrolment ratio |
77.03
|
86.91
|
100.00
|
|
| Public education expenditure as % of
GNP |
59.68
|
47.80
|
64.98
|
100.00
|
Source:
Business Intelligence Unit, Chennai
Table
1.3
RATES OF
RETURN TO INVESTMENT IN EDUCATION
BY
REGION AND LEVEL OF SCHOOLING
(in
percentage)
Region
|
Social
|
Private
|
| |
Primary
|
Secondary
|
Higher
|
Primary
|
Secondary
|
Higher
|
| Sub-Saharan Africa |
24.3
|
18.2
|
11.2
|
41.3
|
2
6.6
|
27.8
|
| Asia |
19.9
|
13.3
|
11.7
|
39
|
18.9
|
19.9
|
| Europe, Middle-East and North Africa |
15.5
|
11.2
|
10.6
|
17.4
|
15.9
|
21.7
|
| Latin America and the Caribbean |
17.9
|
12.8
|
12.3
|
26.2
|
16.8
|
19.7
|
| OECD countries |
n.a.
|
10.2
|
8.7
|
n.a.
|
12.4
|
12.3
|
Source:
Priorities and strategies for education - A
World Bank review 1995
Table
1.4
RATES OF
RETURN TO INVESTMENTS IN
DIFFERENT
SECTORS OF THE ECONOMY
(inpercentage)
Educational investments
|
1974 to 1982
|
| Primary |
20
|
| Secondary |
14
|
| Higher |
11
|
| World Bank projects |
1983-92
|
| Agriculture |
11
|
| Industry |
12
|
| Infrastructure |
16
|
| All projects |
15
|
Source:
Priorities and strategies for
education
-
A World Bank review 1995
Table
1.5
COUNTRIES
WHICH HAVE MOVED TO
MARKET
BASED ECONOMIES
Country
|
Population 1996
(Millions)
|
| Algeria |
29
|
| Armenia |
4
|
| Azerbaijan |
8
|
| Bangladesh |
122
|
| Belarus |
10
|
| Bulgaria |
8
|
| China |
1215
|
| Croatia |
5
|
| Czech Republic |
10
|
| Estonia |
1
|
| Georgia |
5
|
| Hungary |
10
|
| India |
945
|
| Kazakhstan |
16
|
| Kyrgyz Republic |
5
|
| Latvia |
2
|
| Lithuania |
4
|
| Macedonia FYR |
2
|
| Nigeria |
115
|
| Poland |
39
|
| Romania |
23
|
| Russian Federation |
148
|
| Slovak Republic |
5
|
| Slovenia |
2
|
| Tajikistan |
6
|
| Turkmenistan |
5
|
| Ukraine |
51
|
| Uzbekistan |
23
|
| Yugoslavia |
11
|
| Total population of these countries |
2829
|
| World population |
5754
|
| Percent |
49.17%
|
Source:
World Bank
Table
1.6
GLOBAL
GROWTH OF TECHNOLOGY LED BUSINESSES
(in USD
Billion)
Sector
|
Year 2000
|
Year 2010
|
| Aerospace |
70
|
160
|
| Pharmaceuticals |
300
|
1,100
|
| Geomatics |
10
|
60
|
| Advanced
Materials |
450
|
880
|
| Computer
equipment |
189
|
630
|
| Internet |
843
|
1,300
|
| Software |
785
|
2,300
|
| Telecom
services |
270
|
630
|
| Telecom
equipment |
250
|
500
|
| Robotics
and Automation |
5
|
10
|
| Total |
3,172
|
7,560
|
| Increase
|
|
4388
|
| World
GDP |
30,000
|
36,600
|
| Increase |
|
6,600
|
| % |
11
|
21
|
| %
increase in share |
|
66
|
Source:
Reliance Research


|